🕔 Call For Paper — Vol. 13 | Issue 9 | September 2026 | Deadline: 27-Sep-2026
Track Paper Submit Paper Home
📢 NOTICE
DOI will be assigned to every published paper at no additional charge. ๐Ÿ“ข Call for Papers โ€” Volume 13, Issue 9 (September 2026) | Submission Deadline: September 30, 2026 | Rapid peer review: 2โ€“3 days | Impact Factor: 7.37 (SJIF 2026)

Paper Details

📄 IJAERD-2026-0062

Comparative Assessment of Dynamic Voltage Restorer and D-STATCOM for Voltage Sag and Swell Mitigation in a Distribution Network

Author(s):Anionovo Ugochukwu Edebeani, Okafor Emmanuel Chigbo, Charles Austeen Ibeh, Anazia Emmanuel Aninye
Institution:Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State Nigeria
Published In:Vol. 13, Issue 9 โ€” September 2026
Page No.:8-13
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.22974793
Domain:Electrical Engineering
Type:Research Paper
ISSN (Online):2348-4470
ISSN (Print):2348-6406
Abstract

Power quality disturbances, particularly voltage sag and swell, can adversely affect sensitive loads, industrial processes and the reliability of modern distribution systems. This study presents a comparative simulation-based assessment of two power-electronic mitigation devices: the Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) and the Distribution Static Synchronous Compensator (D-STATCOM). A three-phase distribution network was developed in MATLAB/Simulink at 415 V and 50 Hz, with the principal disturbance represented as a severe voltage sag of 0.7 p.u. The DVR was modeled as a series-connected voltage-source converter with a 100 V dc link, 1 mH filter inductance and 1 ยตF filter capacitance, while the D-STATCOM was modeled as a shunt-connected converter using a 200 V dc bus and coupling interface. Performance was evaluated using load-voltage recovery, total harmonic distortion (THD), dynamic response, overshoot and ripple. The results show that the DVR restored the load voltage to 1.00 p.u., corresponding to 100% recovery, while the D-STATCOM restored it to approximately 0.96 p.u. or 96% recovery. THD decreased from 12.5% before compensation to 2.1% with the DVR and 5.8% with the D-STATCOM, representing reductions of 83.2% and 53.6%, respectively. The measured simulation response times were approximately 2 ms for the DVR and 5 ms for the D-STATCOM. The normalized aggregate technical-performance ranking gave the DVR 64.3% and the D-STATCOM 35.7%. An indicative published cost benchmark cited in the thesis gives lower equipment cost for D-STATCOM, making it attractive where reactive-power support and general voltage regulation are more important than precise deep-sag restoration. The study therefore concludes that the DVR is the stronger technical option for sensitive-load voltage restoration, while the D-STATCOM provides a lower-cost alternative for general voltage support.

Keywords
Power quality; Voltage sag; Voltage swell; Dynamic Voltage Restorer; D-STATCOM; MATLAB/Simulink; Total Harmonic Distortion; Voltage recovery.
🗎 Download PDF 🏆 Get Certificate
🕮 How to Cite

Anionovo Ugochukwu Edebeani, Okafor Emmanuel Chigbo, Charles Austeen Ibeh, Anazia Emmanuel Aninye, “Comparative Assessment of Dynamic Voltage Restorer and D-STATCOM for Voltage Sag and Swell Mitigation in a Distribution Network”, International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD), Vol. 13, Issue 9, pp. 8-13, September 2026, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22974793.

Related Papers

📄 Submit Your Paper

Open Access • Peer Reviewed • CrossRef DOI
UGC Approved • Monthly Publication

Submit Now →
📅 Submission Deadline
27 Sep 2026
Vol. 13 | Issue 9
September 2026